Business success depends on selecting the correct technical services company, yet it’s simple to make expensive mistakes. This guide examines typical mistakes to steer clear of when choosing an IT partner. You will explore how important it is to do in-depth research, consider factors more than just pricing, make sure the culture fits, establish clear goals, and make future plans. Gaining knowledge in these crucial areas will help you make wise choices and create fruitful collaborations that advance your company.
-
Not doing enough homework
Selecting a technical services company is not a task that should be accomplished without careful consideration. It will also be good to know that these companies are involved in some of the most important functions and systems in your business. The biggest mistake that many companies make is to pursue a partnership without first taking the time to seek proper advice on which providers are available out there.
This is an important step in the preparation of the RFP process that may take time before you start preparing it, it involves finding out the vendors operating within your regional or vertical market. Search for those companies that do not seem to offer general services but those that would be limited to the technical services that you require. Go to the Internet to look for the comments left by the clients in the specific organization as well as the research reports that analyze the capacities, inefficiencies, and capacities of the particular company.
Further filter down the list by checking credentials that may include awards, achievements, years in business, clients they served, their growth rate as well as the sectors in which they specialize. Conduct a thorough search on the company websites for areas where the difference between the promotional words and human capital qualifications and expertise exist. If possible, arrange a call with the account managers in prospective companies to get the idea of the quality of the staff and the line of the proposals.
-
Focusing solely on price
Perhaps, one of the most common pitfalls that organizations make when choosing an appropriate technology services provider is the focus on the price factor when looking for the right value. But, as it is quite often appropriate to work under a rather narrow budget we can choose the lowest bid for the contract, which, in fact, significantly constraints capabilities not only for achieving IT goals.
A technical partner of choice must have fairly priced services but provided by skilled technical staff. Your evaluation criteria should not be about the next lowest bid, but rather about competencies to meet current and future goals. These may be cloud, cybersecurity, app development, and infrastructure management to name but a few, implying that the necessary capabilities may be cross-disciplinary.
-
Cultural fit: when it is not given sufficient attention
The mutual understanding of the cultural differences that may exist in any two organisations is also an important factor that should be considered in the partnership. It has been revealed that shared values, collaboration, and open communication with vendors can be considered as the major drivers of satisfaction, despite the fact that these criteria are often not the focus of vendor selection. The lack of assessment of fit is detrimental because it increases frustration to both parties and decreases the accomplishment of strategic objectives.
Compatibility can also be verified through a meeting with operational leads, who will be in charge of the actual delivery of services. Avoid limiting the conversation to sales where you focus on the promises that are expected out of engagement models. Determine where the organizational structures were similar and where they may diverge enough to give rise to conflict. Pose hypothetical scenarios to assess the organization’s responsiveness and adaptability accordingly.
-
Do not set goals and measure outcomes
In technical service engagement, the performance goals and objectives might not be very well defined at the beginning. This makes it very challenging to assess the correlation between inputs and the expected outcomes. In relationships, there can be a divergence of expectations regarding what success in such an arrangement really entails, thus making the arrangement sensitive to failure. It is therefore suicidal not to clearly define what quantitative and qualitative goals have to be achieved both at the onset.
When identifying KPIs to be used in engagement, it is advisable to use specific targets as many as possible. Relate the measures directly to the tactical objectives and the organizational capabilities which are expected from the technical partner. Some include system availability, mean-time-to-respond, mean-time-to-fix, the users’ satisfaction rating, gaining certifications, the cost-model optimization, increasing flexibility, compliance, minimizing risks, and others.
-
No Exit Strategy
Despite the positive outcome in the relationships that a firm has with technical service providers, it is understood that the contractual relationship will reach a point of termination. As the saying goes, ‘Necessity is the mother of invention. ’ Needs transform, contracts end, new solutions develop, and partnerships can only be for a specific time. Similarly, lack of an exit strategy plan creates even bigger challenges in terms of filling voids that are created in terms of expertise, best practices, experience and other issues. This is a preventable calamity, and one should try to look at the big picture and envision how the engagement will end from the onset.
In the following details it is necessary to outline the specifics of expected timelines that should be used to match contracts to adoption curves of the proposed technologies and services. Including levers to prolong the agreements ensures one does not change deals frequently, but they do not fashion contracts that lock one into partnership agreements that are no longer valuable.
Conclusion
Selecting the best technical services companies in Dubai is essential to the success of your organization. You may make a better-informed choice if you steer clear of five typical blunders: not doing enough research, concentrating just on cost, disregarding cultural fit, failing to establish specific objectives, and not having an exit strategy. Don’t forget to carefully assess possible partners, take long-term value into account, and make plans for every step of the collaboration.
